Archive for the ‘artsy/musically’ Category

Review: A Night of Jazz @ CSO, April 23rd

Sunday, April 25th, 2010

This started when I was to give a professor a CD of some software he needed. I put it in a Nina Simone jewel case. He noticed, and we talked briefly about the merits of the CD (it was a compilation). That evolved into a the question: “You like jazz?” and ended with him offering me two tickets to Friday’s performance at the CSO. You never know who you’re going to meet in this world, I suppose.

Joshua Redman was the headliner, I’m sure, but opening was a young woman named Anat Cohen. A quick read of her bio identifies her as a relative newcomer, arriving in New York City in 1999. Her multi-ethnic trio powered their way through four compositions and about 40 minutes of play time. What struck me most was her energy, a quality that isn’t so easily captured on studio recordings. She would catch the beat and happily bounce in place with clarinet in hand.

A slow piece, an Brazillian composition, and a couple of selections from the album she had just put out rounded her evening. What was apparent that, sometimes she would miss her lead in, and the band would have to come back around to pick her up. At those times, she would grin at her bandmates and keep her foot tapping. She introduced the band twice, obviously happy to share the spotlight. An insert in the program indicated that she’s be in the lobby after the show, and she was, beaming and talking excitedly to new fans.

After a short intermission, Joshua Redman and his James Farm project took the stage. One of the things that bugs me about jazz shows is the fact that the temptation is always there for a big name to phone it in, assured that their place in the canon and the grand pantheon of American music has assured them of another sizable paycheck. In my opinion, Redman didn’t phone it in. But you wouldn’t have known it from the audience’s reaction.

What DID happen, though, is that a LOT of people left. Early. In the middle of the second composition, the exodus started. After he played his last, the crowd on the main floor was about half standing O and half packing the aisles. Even as he came back out for an encore, people did not scramble back to their seats in a madcap rendition of musical chairs; they were headed to Michigan Avenue and all points that were not Symphony Hall.

In our usual seats in the Gallery, you only tackle those Alps-like stairs when you’re sure the show is done. In this Other World we had inhabited for the evening, the lack of stairs emboldened people to get up and leave. The show ended close to 11pm, so I assume that the time had something to do with the rate of exit. Was it Redman’s music? I don’t think so, although there were a few times were the effect would have been doubled if he’d played some passages louder or expounded on some seemingly lazy phrases, but it was what it was.

If anything, this evening introduced me to an artist I had previously not heard of and her music although,a s I mentioned before, I don’t know if her live presence translates well to anything but a live DVD, if only as testament to her energy. Redman? He didn’t suck, but he didn’t bring anything particularly challenging to us either. A lot of chord runs, a lot of discordant drumming and piano playing into which both Cohen and Redman would insert a few notes for significant parts of time.

All in all, my wife and I had a decent time, and we certainly appreciated being able to go.

on the radio

Friday, March 26th, 2010

troy and i used to turn on the radio and listen as we went to sleep. this was back in the day when wbez still played jazz at night. those were good times. when wbez changed their format (much to our chagrin), we (ok, it was all my idea) switched over to what was at the time wnua. yes, folks, smooth jazz has actually been played in our house. i’m not sorry about it, either. it’s tolerable in small doses (like right before you doze off). but when that station switched formats, we gave up on the whole “radio before sleep” concept. until a week or so ago, when i remembered that there’s a new smooth jazz station. i won’t say there was much rejoicing, but it was nice to have an option again. actually, i know there’s a lot of people who rejoiced when this station appeared, but that’s a separate discussion.

i say all of that to say that i was listening as i was trying to get to sleep last night and heard the following 3 songs:

sade: “babyfather” – this is from her new album (and you have no idea how nice it is to be able to say her new album) and i had no idea it was being played as a single.

dave brubeck quartet: “take five” – i don’t have to say anything about this song, do i?

simply red (!): “sunrise” – i admit to being *thisclose* to getting out of bed to blog/tweet about this last night when this song 1st came on, b/c any station that plays sade, dave brubeck, and what i thought was hall & oates back-to-back-to-back is ok with me, but then i realized it wasn’t hall & oates. i couldn’t quite figure out who it was until the dj said it was simply red (!). and simply red gets the (!) treatment b/c, well, it’s simply red (!) and i’d kinda forgotten they existed.

i think this is where i’m supposed to rant about the current sucktasticness of radio and how it’s all owned by conglomerates and all the stations play all the same artists and it’s nothing you want to hear and hooray internet b/c how else would we have music we’d want to listen to and all that, but in this instance, radio was actually pretty cool. i’m sure there was some sucktasticness later in that set, but i was asleep by then and missed it, so oh well. :-P

Gotdamn, I loves me some books.

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

I’ve been studying some computer stuff at work in these random lulls in activity we’ve been having. Figured that I’d be productive and crack open a book and take some notes. Problem: since college, I have no aptitude for sitting and reading and taking notes. I was getting so sleepy I lost consciousness for a few seconds. Then I figured it was best if I just got up and did something else.

So I got up, put my coat on, and went to the 57th Street Bookstore, which is a short trek through an alley and half-a-block away.

The penultimate Twilight Zone episode features a dude who only wants to read, and when the world ends, and it’s nothing but him and books. Then, the most dastardly, wrongish, coldblooded thing EVAR happens to him that I shudder thinking about it. (That episode is also why I have not watched a single episode since I saw that one; I have no idea how anything else could affect me as badly as that episode did. I keep a spare pair of glasses just BECAUSE OF THAT EPISODE.)

I’ve raved about the bookstore before; I come not to praise it as a customer service haven, but a place where books are waiting. Picking them up, reading the back covers, maybe flipping through and reading a few pages. Recipe books about cooking with fat. A biography of Louis Armstrong. Sonia Sanchez haikus. And I, quite literally, am a kid in a candy store. And it makes me happy to write about.

And then I remember that I can’t buy anything because I have no money to buy them and we have no place to put yet more books. But I’m okay with that. For now.

book fail

Friday, January 15th, 2010

have you ever found yourself apologizing and/or making excuses for a book you’ve read? that was me yesterday after finishing a book about certain leading figures of the harlem renaissance. no, i’m not going to mention the book or link it here, but if you really want to know, send me an e-mail or something.

at any rate…this book was pretty underwhelming. i was particularly disappointed b/c the harlem renaissance is one of my favorite historical periods. y’know how some people are world war ii or civil war buffs, and they’re all about reading books (both fiction and nonfiction) from those particular eras? the harlem renaissance is kinda like that for me. you can see why i was excited about reading a book that previously had escaped my notice. i mean, i took a class at nu about the harlem renaissance, so it’s not as if i haven’t read a book (or ten, or a couple dozen) on the subject. not saying that i’m an expert b/c that’s very far from the truth…just that this was presented as a seminal text in the field and i was kinda surprised that it had flown under my radar.

i found myself making excuses for the sucktasticness of the book. it was written in 1991, or so i thought, so therefore it came out just as more information was being disseminated about some of the folks featured in the book. i was wrong. i just looked at the book again and it was published in 1999, so i’m no longer willing to offer that excuse.

excuse #2: it’s almost like a coffee-table book. there’s lots of pictures and the book isn’t that long of a read, so one could flip through it while hanging out at someone’s home, etc. that would be ok, if if was meant just as a picture book and it didn’t contain multi-page biographical sketches of people.

and those bio sketches? incomplete. the profile on james weldon johnson mentioned nothing about his writing the lyrics for ‘lift ev’ry voice and sing.’ (apologies to any twitter followers who read about that yesterday.) langston hughes was one of the most prolific writers of his time, and there’s nothing about the short stories and other works he published after, say, 1931. and if you’re going to make a statement about how almost all the women featured in the book had intimate relationships with other women, then you should be able to back that up.

so, yeah. this book? not awesome. i’m glad i checked it out from the library and didn’t actually buy it.

but it was useful for one thing, though. i’m now on the lookout for any books or research about the sexuality of ‘key figures’ of the harlem renaissance. (another apology to twitter followers for the redundancy.) there were more than a few people who could be classified as bisexual, if not gay/lesbian, but for the most part, no one ever really made a big deal about it. i don’t know if folks were given more leeway b/c they were ‘artists’ and therefore it was expected that they’d behave outside of the social norm, or if it was just understood that no one cared as long as they weren’t super obvious about it, or what. i’m intrigued by it, though, and i’m thinking (hoping?) someone’s done some work on this. if not, i might have to pretend to want to do a research paper on this, and i’m not sure i’m willing to commit to that. if you have any leads on books/papers/websites/etc. pertaining to this, though, feel free to share them with me. thanks.

Change of plan.

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

Little pieces of me die when I can’t (or don’t) draw. So much of my self-identity is tied up in me doing it, that it just feels weird when I look at my little site-that-could and see that I abandon it for months at a time. I usually blame the job, but, 12 hour workday or not, I wasn’t drawing a whole lot when I was unemployed.

Now that I’ve started to write more, my creative energies are diverted. I want to write better, and for a while there, I felt like I was improving. I did reviews, short fiction, but writers’ block hit and my progress halted.

Now, yet another outlet has popped up, and this may take a while to rectify with what my self-identity is/was. For ten years, I’ve been paid to be the computer nerd, but I hung on fiercely to the notion that, once I left work, I wasn’t fixing anyone else’s computer but mine and e’s (with some notable exceptions). I was a person, dammit, working eight so I can live the other 16 the way I wanted to. Nowadays, I’m working 12 so I can live 4 so I can sleep 8.

But now I’m into this trumpet thing. And it is awesome, because I’m playing actual notes and whatnot. Even learned how to play “When the Saints Go Marching In” at my first lesson. Very excited about that!

So, what am I? I am not what I get paid to be, although some individuals have embraced their vocation as who they are. What am I? I’d rather define myself than to be defined, but due to time, necessity of sleep, and so much going on, I’m pulled in a few directions, but I wonder if it’s too many or is endemic on a short attention span.

hooray muppets!

Sunday, November 22nd, 2009

o hai! in honor of the muppet-o-rama going on at the siskel film center this month, and because i’m too lazy to actually write anything right now, i bring you random muppetry.

beaker singing ‘feelings’:

a literal video version of ‘the rainbow connection’:

rowlf for ideal toys:

eta: ‘bohemian rhapsody’

i promise to post ‘real’ content soon. it’s gonna happen! :-)

Waking up.

Monday, October 19th, 2009

The alarm went off, and she tried not to think. Tried not to think of anything more complex than the motor functions needed to sit up and hit the snooze button. Tried not to have her eyes adjust to the morning light in her bedroom. Tried not to feel her husband, in a subconscious effort not to hear her alarm himself, snuggle deeper into the covers and pull just a bit more cover to his side.

What she didn’t want to do was to think too hard about anything, because once her brain got started, there would be no more sleep. It was hard enough to fall asleep, a task she had to prep for hours in advance, with herbal teas, some yoga, and a strict rule of nothing to raise her blood pressure in the hour or two before bed, a rule her man found less and less amusing as time went on.

Of music criticsm and writing about music in general..

Sunday, October 11th, 2009

The trade of writing about music hasn’t changed in the nearly 200 years since it became a journalistic sideline. The trick is still to find concrete images to describe and appraise non-verbal art and the feelings it engenders, while sustaining one’s youthful candor and openess…despite the mellowing or wisdom or crankiness or despair or “revelations that comes with age.”

Gary Giddins

My wife got me this great book by Mr. Giddibs, who’s written jazz criticism longer than I’ve been alive, puts into words what you’re trying to do when writing about music. The trick is to put something that’s not all words into words. To make someone feel as if they’re feeling it themselves as they’re reading the words you’re writing. That’s the kind of thing I aspire to.

His role in jazz is also something that I want to emulate in some way. He’s heard good music, doe research on it, talked to those who’ve done it, and simply can’t understand why more people aren’t in the know. He wants to share, to “here, I got some good music for you!” without making a mix CD or sensing you mp3s over email. His sense of enthusiasm is evident in his writing, and it’s almost infectious.

One of the links I’ve found is what he says about jazz and libraries. Without promotion, and people coming in and talking about it, all they’re doing is storing this stuff for someone to find, instead of searching it out.

i swear i’m gonna do a ‘real’ post soon.

Friday, May 29th, 2009

in the meantime, though, i’m sharing one of my favorite poems with you. i’ve had pieces of it stuck in my brain off and on this week and i’m not sure why, so i’m taking it as a sign that i should reacquaint myself with it and/or (re)introduce y’all to it. enjoy.

May audio!

Friday, May 1st, 2009

Better than April snow showers and May, um, flowers, I suppose. Hadn’t done this in a while.

12 MB, 15 minutes. Track information in the mp3. Not too hip-hoppy, but it’s good music.

MP3